Skip to main content
1-2 min read

Third Variable Fallacy

Attributes a relationship between two variables to causation when both are driven by an unconsidered third factor.

Quick summary
  • Definition: Attributes a relationship between two variables to causation when both are driven by an unconsidered third factor.
  • Impact: Third Variable Fallacy distorts reasoning by Failing to consider confounders leads to wrong causal attributions and poor decisions.
  • Identify: Look for patterns like Notice A and B move together.

What is the Third Variable Fallacy?

A hidden variable can create the illusion of a direct link. Without controlling for confounders, causal claims can be misleading.

People lean on this pattern because Confounders are sometimes invisible or hard to measure; simple stories are appealing.

The Pattern
  • 1Notice A and B move together.
  • 2Assume A causes B (or vice versa).
  • 3Ignore a third factor C that affects both A and B.

Why the Third Variable Fallacy fallacy matters

This fallacy distorts reasoning by Failing to consider confounders leads to wrong causal attributions and poor decisions.. It often shows up in contexts like Epidemiology, Economics, Business analytics, where quick takes and ambiguity can hide weak arguments.

Examples of Third Variable Fallacy in Everyday Life

Everyday Scenario
"Health anecdote."
A:People who carry lighters get lung disease, so lighters cause it.
B:Smoking is the third factor causing both.
Serious Context

Crime and ice cream sales rise together; climate/temperature is the third factor influencing both.

Why it is fallacious

Failing to consider confounders leads to wrong causal attributions and poor decisions.

Why people use it

Confounders are sometimes invisible or hard to measure; simple stories are appealing.

How to Counter It

Recognition

  • Causal claims from observational correlation without controls.
  • Alternative common causes unaddressed.
  • Interventions are proposed on the wrong variable.

Response

  • Identify plausible confounders and request controlled analysis.
  • Use designs that can isolate effects (RCTs, matched samples).
  • Be cautious with observational data before acting on causation.
Common phrases that signal this fallacy
  • “Third Variable Fallacy” style claim: Attributes a relationship between two variables to causation when both are driven by an unconsidered third factor.
  • Watch for phrasing that skips evidence, e.g. "Attributes a relationship between two variables to causation when both are driven by an unconsidered third factor"
  • Pattern hint: Notice A and B move together.
Better reasoning / Repair the argument

Identify plausible confounders and request controlled analysis.

Often confused with

Third Variable Fallacy is often mistaken for False Cause, but the patterns differ. Compare the steps above to see why this fallacy misleads in its own way.

Variants

Close variations that are easy to confuse with Third Variable Fallacy.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Third Variable Fallacy always invalid?

Third Variable Fallacy signals a weak reasoning pattern. Even if the conclusion is true, the path to it is unreliable and should be rebuilt with sound support.

How does Third Variable Fallacy differ from False Cause?

Third Variable Fallacy follows the pattern listed here, while False Cause fails in a different way. Looking at the pattern helps choose the right diagnosis.

Where does Third Variable Fallacy commonly appear?

You will find it in everyday debates, opinion columns, marketing claims, and quick social posts—anywhere speed or emotion encourages shortcuts.

Can Third Variable Fallacy ever be reasonable?

It can feel persuasive, but it remains logically weak. A careful version should replace the fallacious step with evidence or valid structure.

Further reading